farmville task abc of herosim straits of ardour

Then there are the mod tracker kids, who will likely be using Renoise. i think Tradition Waveform is rather underrated, but also seems to be quite good for this kind of thing. I don't think there is a consensus, people tend to have different goals and workflows, so they'll adopt whatever software fits their needs.Īrdour or Mixbus for those that are after a traditional / Protools-like DAW.įor the electronic musician, who needs a DAW with excellent midi sequencing, or a better workflow for live use Bitwig Studio will likely be best. Sounds Freesound ccMixter Songs, samples under CC Musical Artifacts : Sounfonts, samples, synth presets etc.Ĭurated software list Awesome-linuxaudio JHoermannįorums AV Linux forums KXStudio forums Demonic Sweaters linux audio productions, tutorials, floss software demos Linux Music : lots of tutorial and explanations about linux audio, jack, synthesis. Youtube Channels Tobiasz Karoń : Zynaddsubx, ardour, jack, obxd, calf and more. On freenode #laa #lad #lau #opensourcemusicians However, in a few cases,įoreground processing is actually faster so my macros may jump from foreground processing to background processing to achiever optimum speed.A subreddit dedicated towards music and audio related topics on the Linux platform. not working on selected objects in the view but working directly on objects in Project's underlying database). Just for reference, something else I avoid for faster execution is doing everything possible in background mode (i.e. Slowdown is due to more overhead in the application and different file format. I've never experienced an unacceptable run time although things did get slower with the release of Project 2010, I assume the I've written a lot a complex data transfer macros over the years (99% are from Project to Excel) and I have always used arrays. That supports the gain claims of using arrays as intermediate storage of data for large transfers. macro running in Excel), is not first loading the data into arraysīefore dumping into Project and that's why it takes over 3 minutes to execute. If you're able to run a macro from Project to read the data from Excel for over 1000 tasks and 50+ fields in 19 seconds, I'd say that's pretty good. You're welcome and thanks for the feedback. Rod Gill Author of the one and only Project VBA Book becks23,

However it does require using a workbook with the required macro in it every time. This greatly reduces inter-process actions so speeding up the code. I haven't been able to read an array but the Function can return a comma delimted string and you can use Split() to convert to an array for writing into appropriate 'Test' is the name of the Function in Excel and 2 is the row number to read from. Set xlApp = GetObject(, 'Excel.Application')

The only thing that will work is to have an Excel macro in the Excel file build a string for a task and call it from Project using: Reading dataįrom Excel into an array in Project VBA has no speed advantage because the data crosses from the Excel process to Project process so no speed gain. So exporting from Project to Excel using arrays and Project VBA code is fast. The slow bit is working between processes. I've been doing a fair bit of importing Excel data to project macros recently and they can be slow for 1000,s of tasks.

Farmville task abc of herosim straits of ardour